The significant other in professional path planning and readiness for scientific activity: The case of Russian students and postgraduates

Introduction. The formation of professional plans by student youth is going on under the influence of significant others. The circle of significant others is suffering profound transformations in the conditions of changing cyber-technological paradigm, overflowing traditional family circle, friends, school masters (mentors), and needs clarification. The orientation and intensity of the impact of significant others on the modern educated youth’s professional planning are not sufficiently studied. Solving the task of staff renewal in the Russian scientific sphere shows the necessity to reveal the roles of significant others in Russian students’ and postgraduates’ readiness to build a scientific career.

Aim. In this research, the significant other is a really existing or imaginary person, who significantly influences student professional path planning, when a student identifies himself/herself with the significant other. The present research aims to reveal significant others, who influence professional plans of Russian students and postgraduates, and to establish the nature of its impact; to elicit the role of significant others in the students’ and postgraduates’ readiness to build a scientific career.

Methodology and research methods. A three-part questionnaire was applied to collect data. In the first part, general information about the respondents was collected. The second part included three stages, which allowed the authors to identify three significant others, who influenced the respondents’ professional plans, as well as to discover the nature of this influence. In the third part, the respondents reported about their readiness to build a scientific career. Primary data processing was carried out with the help of content-analysis. Secondary data processing involved descriptive statistics methods, non-parametric Pearson test, χ2, qualitative analysis. 1026 young people aged from 17 to 35, whose average age was 21, took part in the investigation. There were 951 students and 75 postgraduates from 10 Russian universities.

Results. It was established that significant others influence the respondents’ professional plans positively, neutrally and negatively. The positive impact prevails sharply over the neutral and negative ones. Over one-third of the students and postgraduates find it difficult to identify significant others. Among the significant others, there are both real people, who live now or have lived in the past, and imaginary characters. The real significant others can be subdivided into two groups: distant and close community. The role of significant other from distant community predominates over the influence of close community representatives.

Scientific novelty. The authors designed the empirical model of significant others influencing the professional path planning. It was revealed that the students and postgraduates, who are not ready to become scientists, less often plan their professional paths under the influence of significant others from scientists and discoverers, than the other respondents. The hierarchical structures of students’ and postgraduates’ significant others have different readiness levels (from five to seven) to build a scientific career and have various component composition. In addition, a higher rank of scientists and discoverers as significant others in the sampling of future scientists should be noted.

Practical significance. The obtained results, which deepen the understanding of the mechanism of professional identification and career decision-making, can be used in the practice of professional orientation and career counselling for young people. Since most students and postgraduates have difficulties in building professional plans or identify themselves with fictional characters or people involved in the public spheres like culture, art and mass media, the right choice of content and channels of professional propaganda can encourage young people to get a higher education and choose educational areas that are socially significant for the country.

1. Freud S. Psihologija bessoznatel’nogo = Psychology of the unconsciousness [Internet]. Saint-Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 08]. 522 p. Available from: https://www.piter.com/product/psihologiya-bessoznatelnogo (In Russ.)

2. Erikson E. H. Identity and the life cycle [Internet]. N.-Y. W.W. Norton & Company; 1994 [cited 2023 Mar 15]. 192 p. Available from: https://archive.org/details/identitylifecycl00erik/mode/2up

3. Mukhina V. S. Mify i Real’nost’ (Al’ternativnyj vzgljad. Sistemnyj podhod. Innovacionnye aspekty) = Personality: Myths and reality (Alternative view. A systematic approach. Innovative aspects) [Internet]. Moscow: National Book Centre; 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 15]. 1088 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37596636 (In Russ.)

4. Orel V. E. Psihologicheskie osnovy profkonsul’tacionnoj raboty so shkol’nikami = Psychological foundations of professional counseling work with schoolchildren [Internet]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University; 1990 [cited 2023 Mar 04]. 84 p. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001533270 (In Russ.)

5. Petrovsky A. V. The tree-factor model of significant other. Voprosy psihologii = Questions of Psychology [Internet]. 1991 [cited 2023 Mar 09]; 1: 7–18. Available from: http://www.voppsy.ru/issues/1991/911/911007.htm (In Russ.)

6. Andreeva A. D., Lisichkina A. G. The problem of professional self-determination of youth in the research of the Psychological Institute: 1920–2020. Teoreticheskaja i jeksperimental’naja psihologija = Theoretical and Experimental Psychology [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 07]; 15 (3): 198–210. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49555900 (In Russ.)

7. Talanov S. L. Influence of reference personality, social capital of family group on formation of educational and professional strategy of children. Vestnik vysshej shkoly = Alma Mater. 2020; 4: 28–37. DOI: 10.20339/AM.04-20.028 (In Russ.)

8. Gokhberg L. M., Ditkovsky K. A., Evnevich E. I., et al. Indikatory nauki: 2020: statisticheskij sbornik = Indicators of Science: 2020: Statistical collection. Moscow: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; 2020. 336 p. DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-2184-7 (In Russ.)

9. Leaper C., Farkas T., Brown C. S. Adolescent girls’ experiences and gender- related beliefs in relation to their motivation in math/science and English. Journal Youth Adolescence. 2012; 41 (3): 268–282. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-011-9693-z

10. Prokhorova M. V., Savicheva A. V., Plotnikova E. S., Kozlova L. A. The mentor’s role in forming readiness of youth for scientific activity and attitude to science in school period. In: Sem’ja i deti v sovremennom mire. Sbornik materialov konferencii = Family and Children in the Modern World. Collection of Conference Materials [Internet]. Vol. VII. Kyzyl: TuvGU; 2022 [cited 2023 Mar 10]; p. 449–456. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50399078 (In Russ.)

11. Prokhorova M. V., Savicheva A. V. Professional preferences of generations Y and Z. In: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj jubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvjashhennoj 50-letiju sozdanija Instituta psihologii RAN = Materials of the International Anniversary Scientific Conference Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of the Establishment of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Internet]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2022; p. 759–761 [cited 2023 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50090274 (In Russ.)

12. Bochaver K. A., Dovzhik L. M. Social environment and personal choice in the life path of world champions: Case study. Aktual’nye problemy psihologicheskogo znanija = Actual Problems of Psychological Knowledge [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Mar 15]; 4 (41): 51–67. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29039615 (In Russ.)

13. Maistrenko E. V., Maistrenko V. I. Value components of relationship of student youth in Surgut with “Significant others”. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = The Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2021; 5 (74): 94–101. DOI: 10.26105/SSPU.2021.64.15.011 (In Russ.)

14. Bettin K. A. The role of mentoring in the professional identity formation of medical students. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2021; 52 (1): 61–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.08.007

15. Wong L., Yuen M., Chen G. Career-related teacher support: A review of roles that teachers play in supporting students’ career planning. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools. 2020; 31 (1): 130–141. DOI: 10.1017/jgc.2020.30

16. Mohi U. D., Rana U. K., Maqbool S., Din J. R., Hazyefa M., Raza M. A. Parents influence on career choice of medical undergraduates. Parents influence on career choice of medical undergraduates. Professional Medical Journal. 2022; 29 (8): 1268–1274. DOI: 10.29309/TPMJ/2022.29.08.6987

17. Nordin M., Seng H. C. Exploring children’s career planning through career guidance activities: A case study. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development. 2021; 10 (2): 754–765. DOI: 10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10071

18. Ulrich A., Frey A., Ruppert J.-J. The role of parents in young people’s career choices in Germany. Psychology. 2018; 9: 2194–2206. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2018.98125

19. Beckmann J. Gendered career expectations in context: The relevance of normative and comparative reference groups. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2021; 42 (7): 968–988. DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2021.1914547

20. Arbab A. H., Eltahir Y. M., Elsadig F. S., Yousef B. A. Career preference and factors influencing career choice among undergraduate pharmacy students at University of Khartoum, Sudan. Pharmacy. 2022; 10, 26: 1–12. DOI: 10.3390/pharmacy10010026

21. McLaughlin K., Moutray M., Moore C. Career motivation in nursing students and the perceived influence of significant others. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2010; 66 (2): 404–412. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05147.x

22. Litvinenko E. Yu., Kapanyan N. N. Significant others in the context of socialization of youth in the modern world. Mir nauki. Sociologija, filologija, kul’turologija = World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies. 2022; 13 (1). DOI: 10.15862/50SCSK122 (In Russ.)

23. Kosheleva Yu. P. Significant relations: Significant other or loved one? Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 16]; 8 (719): 105–113. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25907067 (In Russ.)

24. Gonockaya N. V. The mass media in the modern sociocommunicative space. Filosofskaja mysl’ = Philosophical Thought. 2018; 7: 42–54. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8728.2018.7.23812 (In Russ.)

25. Matveeva L. V., Petrakova E. E. Significant other in TV communication. Izvestija Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Psihologija = The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series “Psychology” [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2023 Mar 16]; 9: 39–56. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22651262 (In Russ.)

26. Ryaguzova E. V. Content transformation of the “significant other” representation in a transitive society. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija Akmeologija obrazovanija. Psihologija razvitija = Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology. 2020; 9, 3 (35): 241–248. DOI: 10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-3-241-248 (In Russ.)

27. Ellis G. J., Streeter S. K., Engelbrecht J. D. Television characters as significant others and the process of vicarious role taking. Journal of Family Issues. 1983; 4 (2): 367–384. DOI: 10.1177/019251383004002007

28. Min K. Does it matter what they say?: A psychodynamic approach to redefining the role of social network in one’s professional identity transition – Introducing a social pressure process model based on grounded theory [PhD thesis]. 2020. 56 p. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26370.96968

29. Kovaleva N. B. The image of the hero in the representations of the younger generation in the context of the problem of the formation of their identity. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologija = Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Mar 09]; Vol. 7, № 3 (24): 317–321. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35707867 (In Russ.)

30. Semenova L. E. Stanovlenie rebjonka kak gendernogo sub’ekta na jetapah rannego onto- i dizontogeneza = The formation of a child as a gender subject at the stages of early ontogenesis and dysontogenesis [Internet]. N. Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University; 2009 [cited 2023 Mar 10]. 308 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20105314 (In Russ.)

31. Zeer E. F., Symanyuk E. E. Personality’s self-determination psychological features in the post-industrial society. Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovanijah = New in Psychological and Pedagogical Research [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 03]; 1 (53): 76–83. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38489518 (In Russ.)

32. Andersen S. M., Chen S., Miranda R. Significant others and the self. Self & Identity. 2002; 1 (2): 159–168. DOI: 10.1080/152988602317319348

33. Zhuravlev A. L., Soina I. A. The role of personality value orientations in the formation of its socio-psychological space. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 Mar 04]; 4: 218–226. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18873342 (In Russ.)

34. Kimberg A. N., Taganova A. A. Personal identity and relationships with loved ones. Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie = Human. Community. Management [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2023 Mar 11]; 3: 26– 40. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19043076 (In Russ.)

35. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review. 1977; 84 (2): 191–215. DOI: 10.1037/%2F0033-295X.84.2.191

36. Grote G., Hall D. T. Reference groups: A missing link in career studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2013; 83 (3): 265–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.05.001

37. Hallpike H., Vallee-Tourangeau G., Van der Heijden B. A distributed interactive decision-making framework for sustainable career development. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022; 12: 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790533

38. Pablo-Lerchundi I., Morales-Alonso G., Gonzalez-Tirados R.M. Influences of parental occupation on occupational choices and professional values. Journal of Business Research. 2015; 68 (7): 1645– 1649. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.011

39. The smartphone connects us with the strangers and disconnects from the fellow men. Konsul’tativnaja psihologija i psihoterapija = Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2019; 27 (3): 197–210. DOI: 10.17759/cpp.2019270312 (In Russ.)

40. Soldatova G. U. Digital socialization in the cultural-historical paradigm: A changing child in a changing world. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2018; 9 (3): 71–80. DOI: 10.17759/sps.2018090308 (In Russ.)

41. Zarubina N. N., Noskova A. V., Temnitskiy A. D. Trust in social sciences: A view of university youth. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofija. Sociologija. Politologija = Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2018; 41: 114–123. DOI: 10.17223/1998863X/41/13 (In Russ.)

42. Proskurin A. Yu., Grazhdankina E. V. The problem of popularization and involvement of young people in scientific activity. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchno-issledovatel’skij zhurnal = International Research Journal. 2021; 2 (104): 76–80. DOI: 10.23670/IRJ.2021.103.2.077 (In Russ.)